Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- act_intermediaries_guidelines [2019/01/26 14:44] – [Important Links] balaji
+++ act_intermediaries_guidelines [2021/06/06 12:11] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
   * Contents threatening unity, integrity, of the state shall be removed and banned.
-The above are some of the changes mentioned in the latest draft. Even though the positive aspects are clearly being discussed and potrayed, the view of India shifting to a surveillance state is being ignored and not brought into discussion.
+The above are some of the changes mentioned in the latest draft. Even though the positive aspects are clearly being discussed and portrayed, the view of India shifting to a surveillance state is being ignored and not brought into discussion.
 ===== Some Questions =====
+{{ :meme.jpg?nolink&400 |}}
 We, as a Free Software Movement respecting individuals Freedom and Privacy in Social space have some questions and demands clarifications regarding the guidelines.
-  - Does the above results can obly be achieved through surveillance and not by any alternate means?
+  - Does the above results can only be achieved through surveillance and not by any alternate means?
-  - Does the individual needs to sacrifice his #RightToPrivacy and #RightToSpeech surrendering the control to the government?
+  - Does the individual needs to sacrifice their #RightToPrivacy and #RightToSpeech surrendering the control to the government?
   - Is it not a threat to **Privacy** and against **Right to Privacy** according to the constitution?
   - Is there a way for the people to monitor the government apart from Elections once in 5 years?