User Tools

Site Tools


act_intermediaries_guidelines

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
act_intermediaries_guidelines [2019/01/26 14:39] balajiact_intermediaries_guidelines [2021/06/06 12:11] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 13: Line 13:
   * Contents threatening unity, integrity, of the state shall be removed and banned.   * Contents threatening unity, integrity, of the state shall be removed and banned.
  
-The above are some of the changes mentioned in the latest draft. Even though the positive aspects are clearly being discussed and potrayed, the view of India shifting to a surveillance state is being ignored and not brought into discussion.+The above are some of the changes mentioned in the latest draft. Even though the positive aspects are clearly being discussed and portrayed, the view of India shifting to a surveillance state is being ignored and not brought into discussion.
  
-## Some Questions+===== Some Questions ===== 
 + 
 +{{ :meme.jpg?nolink&400 |}}
  
 We, as a Free Software Movement respecting individuals Freedom and Privacy in Social space have some questions and demands clarifications regarding the guidelines. We, as a Free Software Movement respecting individuals Freedom and Privacy in Social space have some questions and demands clarifications regarding the guidelines.
  
-  - Does the above results can obly be achieved through surveillance and not by any alternate means? +  - Does the above results can only be achieved through surveillance and not by any alternate means? 
-  - Does the individual needs to sacrifice his #RightToPrivacy and #RightToSpeech surrendering the control to the government?+  - Does the individual needs to sacrifice their #RightToPrivacy and #RightToSpeech surrendering the control to the government?
   - Is it not a threat to **Privacy** and against **Right to Privacy** according to the constitution?   - Is it not a threat to **Privacy** and against **Right to Privacy** according to the constitution?
   - Is there a way for the people to monitor the government apart from Elections once in 5 years?   - Is there a way for the people to monitor the government apart from Elections once in 5 years?
Line 30: Line 32:
 MEITY has asked for Public opinions regarding the Amendment of Intermediary guidelines and the last date to submit it is **Jan 31st 2019** . After reading about the changes, submit your opinion to **[email protected]** and support the fight against mass surveillance. MEITY has asked for Public opinions regarding the Amendment of Intermediary guidelines and the last date to submit it is **Jan 31st 2019** . After reading about the changes, submit your opinion to **[email protected]** and support the fight against mass surveillance.
  
-## Important Links+===== Important Links ===== 
 + 
 +  - http://meity.gov.in/content/comments-suggestions-invited-draft-%E2%80%9C-information-technology-intermediary-guidelines 
 +  - https://internetfreedom.in/india-must-resist-the-lure-of-the-chinese-model-of-surveillance-and-censorship-intermediaryrules-righttomeme-saveourprivacy/ 
 +  - https://indianexpress.com/article/india/it-act-amendments-data-privacy-freedom-of-speech-fb-twitter-5506572/ 
 +  - https://saveourprivacy.in/ 
 +  - https://sflc.in/faq-draft-amendment-intermediary-guidelines-rules-india 
 +  - http://meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Draft_Intermediary_Amendment_24122018.pdf 
 + 
 + 
act_intermediaries_guidelines.1548513568.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/06/06 12:11 (external edit)