User Tools

Site Tools


act_intermediaries_guidelines

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
act_intermediaries_guidelines [2019/01/26 14:37] balajiact_intermediaries_guidelines [2019/01/26 19:01] balaji
Line 13: Line 13:
   * Contents threatening unity, integrity, of the state shall be removed and banned.   * Contents threatening unity, integrity, of the state shall be removed and banned.
  
-The above are some of the changes mentioned in the latest draft. Even though the positive aspects are clearly being discussed and potrayed, the view of India shifting to a surveillance state is being ignored and not brought into discussion.+The above are some of the changes mentioned in the latest draft. Even though the positive aspects are clearly being discussed and portrayed, the view of India shifting to a surveillance state is being ignored and not brought into discussion. 
 + 
 +===== Some Questions ===== 
 + 
 +{{ :meme.jpg?nolink&400 |}}
  
 We, as a Free Software Movement respecting individuals Freedom and Privacy in Social space have some questions and demands clarifications regarding the guidelines. We, as a Free Software Movement respecting individuals Freedom and Privacy in Social space have some questions and demands clarifications regarding the guidelines.
  
-  - Does the above results can obly be achieved through surveillance and not by any alternate means? +  - Does the above results can only be achieved through surveillance and not by any alternate means? 
-  - Does the individual needs to sacrifice his #RightToPrivacy and #RightToSpeech surrendering the control to the government?+  - Does the individual needs to sacrifice their #RightToPrivacy and #RightToSpeech surrendering the control to the government?
   - Is it not a threat to **Privacy** and against **Right to Privacy** according to the constitution?   - Is it not a threat to **Privacy** and against **Right to Privacy** according to the constitution?
   - Is there a way for the people to monitor the government apart from Elections once in 5 years?   - Is there a way for the people to monitor the government apart from Elections once in 5 years?
Line 27: Line 31:
  
 MEITY has asked for Public opinions regarding the Amendment of Intermediary guidelines and the last date to submit it is **Jan 31st 2019** . After reading about the changes, submit your opinion to **[email protected]** and support the fight against mass surveillance. MEITY has asked for Public opinions regarding the Amendment of Intermediary guidelines and the last date to submit it is **Jan 31st 2019** . After reading about the changes, submit your opinion to **[email protected]** and support the fight against mass surveillance.
 +
 +===== Important Links =====
 +
 +  - http://meity.gov.in/content/comments-suggestions-invited-draft-%E2%80%9C-information-technology-intermediary-guidelines
 +  - https://internetfreedom.in/india-must-resist-the-lure-of-the-chinese-model-of-surveillance-and-censorship-intermediaryrules-righttomeme-saveourprivacy/
 +  - https://indianexpress.com/article/india/it-act-amendments-data-privacy-freedom-of-speech-fb-twitter-5506572/
 +  - https://saveourprivacy.in/
 +  - https://sflc.in/faq-draft-amendment-intermediary-guidelines-rules-india
 +  - http://meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Draft_Intermediary_Amendment_24122018.pdf
  
  
  
act_intermediaries_guidelines.txt · Last modified: 2021/06/06 12:11 by 127.0.0.1